Training experts in nuclear forensics: an interdisciplinary perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52673/18570461.25.2-77.11Keywords:
Nuclear forensics, traditional forensics, nuclear or other radioactive material, forensic expert, trainingprogram, specialized laboratoriesAbstract
The growing risks linked to crimes involving nuclear or other radioactive materials have brought nuclear forensics at the centre of global security concerns. In this context, the investigation of radiological crimes requires more than the application of forensic knowledge, involving the integration of traditional forensic methods with advanced nuclear analysis techniques. This underlines the importance of specialized training for experts capable of addressing these challenges. This study explores international practices in training nuclear forensic experts, emphasizing educational programmes and collaborative initiatives promoted by key organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Nuclear Forensics International Technical Working Group (ITWG). The experiences of countries with consolidated capabilities, such as Germany, Hungary, and the United States, are examined in parallel with those of developing countries, such as the Republic of Moldova, presenting the diversity of capacity-building approaches in nuclear forensics. Based on this analysis, key directions have been defined to guide the development of expert training programmes, ensuring their alignment with both national priorities and international standards.
References
1. IAEA Incident and Trafficking Database (ITDB), [online] itdb-factsheet.pdf (consultat: 12.03.2025).
2. IAEA Advances in Nuclear Forensics: Countering the Evolving Threat of Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material out of Regulatory Control, Proceedings Series, IAEA, Vienna, 2015.
3. IAEA Nuclear Forensics: Beyond the Science, IAEATECDOC-1896, IAEA, Vienna, 2020.
4. Gross, H. Gesammelte kriminalistiche Aufcatze, Leipzig, 1902, [online] https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_XPAqAAAAMAAJ (consultat: 06.04.2025).
5. Anghelescu, I. Dicţionar de Criminalistică. București: Editura Știinţifică și Enciclopedică, 1984. 219 p.
6. Cârjan, L.; Chiper, M. Criminalistică. Tradiţie și Modernism. București: Curtea Veche, 2009. 544 p.
7. Drăghici, C.; Iacob, A., Dobreanu, R. Tratat de tehnică criminalistică, ed. a III-a. Craiova: Sitech, 2018. 572 p.
8. Mayer, K.; Wallenius, M.; Fanghänel, T. Nuclear forensic science-From cradle to maturity. In: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2007, 50, 444-445., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.164
9. IAEA, Response to Events Involving the Inadvertent Movement or Illicit Trafficking of Radioactive Material, IAEA-TECDOC-1313, Vienna, 2002.
10. IAEA, Nuclear Forensics Support, Nuclear Security Series No. 2, Vienna, 2006.
11. IAEA, Nuclear Forensics in Support of Investigations, Nuclear Security Series No. 2-G, Vienna (2015).
12. ITWG nuclear forensics update No. 7 June 2018.
13. ITWG nuclear forensics update No. 18 March 2021.
14. ITWG nuclear forensics update, No. 14 February 2020.
15. Graham, G. et al. Developing traditional forensic science exploitation of contaminated exhibits recovered from a nuclear security event. International Conference Advances in Nuclear Forensics: Countering the Evolving Threat of Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material out of Regulatory Control. Vienna, 2014. IAEA-CN-218-036.
16. Wallenius, M. Nuclear Forensics at JRC, from adhoc analysis to full-grown discipline. Technical Meeting on Nuclear Forensics, Beyond the Science. Vienna, 2019. IAEA CN-218-17., https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951438.eibc2566
17. Kovacs-Szeles, E. Nuclear Forensics Capability Building in Hungary. Technical Meeting on Nuclear Forensics, Beyond the Science. Vienna, 2019. IAEA-CN-218-02.
Downloads
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
