The government of Alexandru Marghiloman under the constraints of wartime

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52673/18570461.26.1-s1.09

Keywords:

peace negotiations, union with Bessarabia, monarchy, statehood, wartime requisitions, dynastic crisis, delaying tactics, treaty ratification

Abstract

Alexandru Marghiloman’s assumption of political leadership during the final year of the First World War constituted a notable act of political resolve, undertaken amidst the collapse of the old European order and the emergence of a new geopolitical landscape. During his tenure as Prime Minister, from 5 March to 24 October 1918, Marghiloman demonstrated composure in navigating a series of complex challenges: negotiations with the Central Powers, the signing of the Treaty of Bucharest, and most significantly, the unification of Bessarabia with Romania, a defining achievement of his mandate. A pressing issue confronting his administration was the economic exploitation of the occupied territories of the Old Kingdom, especially the persistent demands for grain requisitions from Bessarabia. These demands prompted Marghiloman to engage in sustained efforts to limit the requisitioning imposed by the German military authorities, as food shortages in the occupied regions had reached critical levels. The safeguarding of the monarchy remained a consistent priority throughout his administration. This commitment became particularly visible during the controversy surrounding Crown Prince Carol’s secret and abrupt marriage to Miss Ioana Maria Valentina Lambrino (Zizi) in Odessa on 31 August / 13 September 1918. The prince’s unauthorized marriage posed a threat to the legitimacy of the monarchy and, by extension, to Marghiloman’s broader political project. However, disp laying astute political judgment, he used the dynastic crisis as leverage in justifying to the German authorities the continued postponement of the treaty’s ratification. The strategy of delay, pursued in coordination with King Ferdinand, was effectively employed through the introduction of new points of negotiation, including the proposed entry of the Romanian army into Dobruja at a time when Bulgaria had already been occupied by Entente forces. These maneuvers ultimately succeeded in creating the diplomatic space necessary for Romania to reenter the war on the side of the Entente on 10 November 1918, just one day before the signing of the Armistice of Compiègne. Marghiloman’s role as a transitional, and ultimately sacrificial, head of government came to an end on 6 November 1918, only days before this final strategic realignment, concluding a politically and diplomatically consequential episode in Romania’s wartime governance.

References

1. Duca I.G. Amintiri politice. vol. III, colecția „Memorii și mărturii”, Munchen: Ion Dumitru-Verlag, 1982.

2. Alexandru Marghiloman. Note Politice (1897–1924), vol. III (1917–1918). Buzău: Editura Alpha MDN, 2019.

3. Pr., prof., dr. Păcurariu Mircea. Basarabia-aspecte din istoria Bisericii și Neamului. București: Editura Basilica, 2012.

4. Ciachir Nicolae. Basarabia sub stăpânire țaristă (1812–1917). București: Universitatea din București-Facultatea de Istorie, 1992.

5. Argetoianu Constantin. Memorii, vol. V, București: Editura Machiavelli, 1995.

6. Peneș Nicolae. Alexandru Marghiloman – lordul valah. Buzău: Editura Alpha MDN, 2007.

7. Kirițescu Constantin. Istoria Războiului pentru Întregirea României. București: Editura Ştiințifică și Enciclopedică, 1989.

8. Alexandru Marghiloman. Note Politice (1897–1924), vol. IV (1917–1918), Buzău: Editura Alpha MDN, 2019.

9. Seișanu Romulus. Take Ionescu-viața și opera sa. București: Editura ziarului Universul S.A., 1930.

10. Constantiniu Florin. O istorie sinceră a poporului român. București: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 1997.

11. Theodorian-Carada M. Efimeridele. Însemnări & amintiri. 1908–1928, Tipografia Serafica, Săbăoani, jud. Roman, 1937.

Published

2026-04-18

How to Cite

Coman, C. (2026). The government of Alexandru Marghiloman under the constraints of wartime. Akademos, 1(80), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.52673/18570461.26.1-s1.09