Social representations of the family: a generational analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52673/18570461.26.2-81.29

Keywords:

social representations, family, generational differences, Baby Boomers, Generation Y, central core- peripherymodel, ambiguous status zone

Abstract

This study examines the social representations of the family across two distinct generations – Baby Boomers and Generation Y – in the context of contemporary social change. As a social institution, the family is transforming its functions and relational patterns while maintaining its central role in the transmission of values and the intergenerational exchange of support. Cultural capital, including values, traditions, and communication styles, constitutes an important resource for adaptation. The data were analyzed using the prototypical analysis method proposed by P. Vergès within the framework of the structural approach of the central core theory developed by J.-C. Abric. The results reveal significant generational differences. The central core of the Baby Boomers generation is organized around traditional and normative values (“love”, “children”, “respect”, “care”, “parents”), emphasizing family responsibility and the continuity of social norms. In contrast, the central core of Generation Y includes predominantly affective and relational elements (“love”, “respect”, “children”, “home”), reflecting an orientation toward emotional closeness and mutual support. Differences between the generations are also visible at the level of peripheral elements: Baby Boomers value the functional and collectivist dimensions of the family, whereas Generation Y emphasizes emotional well-being, autonomy, and the quality of relationships. The associative element “support” appears in both groups, confirming the perception of the family as an essential resource for mutual assistance. The results demonstrate the dynamic nature of social representations of the family and their sensitivity to intergenerational and cultural changes.

References

1. Pozzi, M.; Fasanelli, R; Pistoni, C. Social Representations of Family: A Comparative Study on Italian Young and Older Adults, în: Journal of Family Issues, 2021, vol. 43, nr. 3, 752-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X21994160

2. De Rosa A.S.; D'Ambrosio, M.; Aiello, S. Mapping Current, Future and Ideal Family Structure and Relations in Emerging Adults. Papers on Social Representations, în: Peer Reviewed Online Journal, 2014, vol. 23, nr. 3-4, 1-31. [online] https://www.academia.edu/114833081/Mapping_Current_Future_and_Ideal_Family_Structure_and_Relations_in_Emerging_Adults (consultat: 16.05.2026).

3. Sombrio Cardoso, A.; Leonardo, M.; Becker Da Silva, M.; More, C. Family social representations in contemporary: an integrative review. Pensando familias. 2020, vol. 24, nr. 1, 29-44. [online] https://www.researchgate. net/publication/345760804_Family_social_representations_in_contemporary_an_integrative_review (consultat: 23.05.2026).

4. Cazacu, Daniela. Reprezentarea socială a familiei contemporane în Republica Moldova. Teză de doctor în psihologie. Chișinău, 2018. [online] http://www.cnaa.md/files/theses/2018/53343/daniela_cazacu_thesis.pdf (consultat: 03.10.2026).

5. Caunenco, I. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie problemy kul'turnykh tsennostey v tranzitivnom obshchestve, în: Psihologie. Revistă ştiinţifico-practică, 2020, vol. 37, nr. 3-4, 74-80.

6. Șleahtițchi, M. Panopticum: Tehnici speciale de pătrundere în adâncul reprezentărilor sociale. Iași: Junimea, 2018. 373 p.

7. Șleahtițchi, M. Analiza structurală a spațiului reprezentațional: semnificații, principii, etape, în: Psihologie. Pedagogie specială. Asistență Socială, 2013, nr. 1 (30), Chișinău, UPS "Ion Creangă", 14-25.

8. Melentieva, A. Reprezentarea socială și prognoze privind dezvoltarea expertizei psihologice judiciare în Republica Moldova. Teza de doctor în psihologie. Chișinău, 2024.

9. Jodelet, D. Les representations sociales, în: Représentations sociales: un domaine en expansion. Paris: PUF, 1989, 31-61. [online] https://imaginariosyrepresentaciones.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/d-jodelet-representationssocia_1.pdf (consultat: 13.05.2026).

10. Abric, J.-C., L'artisan et l'artisanat : analyse du contenu et de la structure d'une représentation sociale, în: Bulletin de psyhologie, 1984, n. 366, 861-875. [online] https://www.persee.fr/doc/bupsy_0007-4403_1984_num_37_366_12621 (consultat: 12.03.2026). https://doi.org/10.3406/bupsy.1984.12621

11. Mannheim, K. The Problem of Generations, în: Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Edited by Paul Kecskemeti. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952. 276-322. [online] https://www.routledge.com/ Essays on the sociology of knowledge (consultat: 23.05.2026).

12. Shamis, E.; Niconov, E. Teoriya pokoleniy: neobyknovennyy Iks. Moskva: Universitet Sinergiya. 2016. 140 p.

13. Abric, J.-C. Specific processes of social representations, în: Papers on Social Representations, 1996, vol. 5, nr. 1, 77-80. [online] https://ru.scribd.com/document/58491722/5-1996Abric (consultat: 13.05.2026).

Published

2026-08-26

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Caunenco, I., & Podborschi, A. (2026). Social representations of the family: a generational analysis. Akademos, 2(81), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.52673/18570461.26.2-81.29